[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: About xsl:scripts
Subject: Re: About xsl:scripts From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 10:07:21 -0400 |
At 10:58 AM 4/14/99 +0100, Guy Murphy wrote: >Hi. > >I've maintained from the start that XSL is a direct competitor for ASP. The >reason why I assert this is because of the speed with which I was willing >to bail out from heavy usage of ASP to using XSL, leaving ASP just as the >glue. Maybe, though I think they'd have to give XSL access to all the ASP objects (for form interaction and all that) to make XSL do all the work ASP can do. Maybe that's a direction they're headed, in which case we'll definitely have MS-XSL to contend with, but I suspect they'll be leaving ASP as the framework and XSL as part of the toolkit. (That's how I'm presenting it in an upcoming ASP book, anyway, but MS has been known to change directions on a regular basis.) Simon St.Laurent XML: A Primer Sharing Bandwidth / Cookies http://www.simonstl.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: About xsl:scripts, Guy_Murphy | Thread | RE: About xsl:scripts, Didier PH Martin |
Re: Testing/searching for several e, Keith Visco | Date | RE: Problem instantiating XMLDOMDo, Didier PH Martin |
Month |
Keywords