[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: W3C-transformation language petition
Subject: Re: W3C-transformation language petition From: Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 10:35:51 +0000 |
Hi. I believe that I've answered similar before.... *windows*. Windows 3.1 shows us quite clearly that marketing can win over regardless of the worth of technology (no veiled references at previous threads). I personaly remember many in the OS/2 community untering the mantra "we have to win, we have the better OS".... didn't do them much good. We do not live in a meritocracy, simply being better technically, or having an advantage or two does not ensure victory. This is doubly important to keep in mind when playing along side Microsoft. I am *not* and anti-MS zealot, I'm actually a keen fan of much of their technology, I'm not however naive and realise that with regard to what technology is rolled into their browsers both MS and NS/AOL will take the path of least resistence. Cheers Guy. xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 03/07/99 06:21:42 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx cc: (bcc: Guy Murphy/UK/MAID) Subject: W3C-transformation language petition Chris Maden <crism@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: [SNIP] So, fine, FOs have an advantage over CSS. Why then would they die if disconnected from XTL/XQL? [SNIP] XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Fw: Fw: W3C-transformation lang, Didier PH Martin | Thread | Re: W3C-transformation language pet, Guy_Murphy |
Re: XSL-T, XTL.... or XQL?, Guy_Murphy | Date | Re: W3C-transformation language pet, Guy_Murphy |
Month |