[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: Complex XSL Application (I think)
Subject: RE: Complex XSL Application (I think) From: agomez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Alberto Gomez Corona) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 12:10:42 +0100 |
the work (XML+XSL->VRML) is under way. i will post when something complete available. -----Original Message----- From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx Sent: viernes 26 de febrero de 1999 10:53 To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: Complex XSL Application (I think) Hi. Have you got any examples of work available publically on the Net? I wouldn't mind a gander at what you're doing. It's out of my field, but it would be nice to see how other developers are addressing their formatting needs (one can often pick up new techniques from looking at those of other trades). Cheers Guy. xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 02/26/99 01:06:06 AM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx cc: (bcc: Guy Murphy/UK/MAID) Subject: RE: Complex XSL Application (I think) NO matter their origin, my opinion is that market and common sense will drive XSL to evolve as a standard general purpose XML preprocessor. In fact we are working on VRML generation straight from XSL rules. any else are working on that? [SNIP] XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
SCRIPT, Jayadeva Babu Gali | Thread | Re: Complex XSL Application (I thin, Wendy Cameron |
Re: no xmlns attribute in the xsl d, Chris Lilley | Date | Re: W3C-transformation language pet, Guy_Murphy |
Month |