[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

RE: Complex XSL Application (I think)


Subject: RE: Complex XSL Application (I think)
From: agomez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Alberto Gomez Corona)
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 12:10:42 +0100

the  work (XML+XSL->VRML) is under way. i will post when something complete
available.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: viernes 26 de febrero de 1999 10:53
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Complex XSL Application (I think)


Hi.



Have you got any examples of work available publically on the Net? I
wouldn't mind a gander at what you're doing. It's out of my field, but it
would be nice to see how other developers are addressing their formatting
needs (one can often pick up new techniques from looking at those of other
trades).

Cheers
     Guy.





xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 02/26/99 01:06:06 AM

To:   xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc:    (bcc: Guy Murphy/UK/MAID)
Subject:  RE: Complex XSL Application (I think)




NO matter their origin, my opinion is that market and common sense will
drive XSL to evolve as a standard general purpose XML preprocessor.
In fact we are working on VRML generation straight from XSL rules.
any else are working on that?
[SNIP]



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list



Current Thread
Keywords