[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: Venting
Subject: RE: Venting From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 09:18:03 -0500 |
At 10:42 AM 2/11/99 +0000, Guy Murphy wrote: >CSS is easier than FOs, but the equation in one of CSS+HTML, which even at >a simple level I would suggest is not, and if one where to take exception >to that I would suggest that expressing pagination in CSS+HTML is not >simpler. You're arguements don't even begin to address the needs of our >brothers in print design, they wont be impressed by your suggestion that >they should use CSS+HTML. What is this 'equation is one of CSS+HTML'? You don't need to use HTML with CSS - you can use it directly with XML, as is done in IE5 and Netscape's Gecko. See the CSS2 spec for info on using CSS with XML, or the MS/NS docs for their browser pre-releases. Simon St.Laurent XML: A Primer / Building XML Applications (April) Sharing Bandwidth / Cookies http://www.simonstl.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Venting, Didier PH Martin | Thread | RE: Venting, Guy_Murphy |
RE: Venting, Didier PH Martin | Date | RE: Time taken to impliment FOs?..., Didier PH Martin |
Month |
Keywords