[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: Venting
Subject: Re: Venting From: Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 15:08:52 +0000 |
Hi Rick. Like yourself, I am actually largely concerned with server-side mark-up. 99% of what I do is concerned with the server-side. It'll be at least a year before I'm likely to experience the joy of FOs rendered in the browser..... this isn't an excuse to be short sighted. There are already 101 solutions for producing server-side mark-up, with XML or with 101 other possible data formats. What we need is a solution that has a smooth flow from XML to rendered content in the browser, with transformation on the client-side allowing scalability, rather than the server. Server-side solutions will continue to move forward, it's the client-side that is in need of inovation. With XML/XSL fully supported on the client, the server is left the task of data retrieval and aggregation, not preparing renderable content for the browser. Examine a large ASP application.... and almost criminal waste of resource. Cheers Guy. xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 02/04/99 04:37:52 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx cc: (bcc: Guy Murphy/UK/MAID) Subject: Re: Venting Hi Guy, I am all in favor of browser manufacturers providing full-featured implementations of both transformations and formatting objects - truly I am. Your desire for a real styling language is something I think many of us share. The fact is, however, that you can count the significant browser manufacturers on one hand - but the number of firms leveraging the power of XML transformation processing in server-side applications could eventually reach into the thousands, even the tens of thousands. If the outcome is that ONLY a browser manufacturer can reasonably create an implementation of 100% of the XSL spec, then should all others in the market segment appear to fall short of the mark? Surely this cannot be reasonable? Again, I reiterate that I have great hopes that browser manufacturers will do well in their implementations of XSL - but it does not seem appropriate to address their needs so singularly, to the exclusion of all others. This entire XML marketplace will move forward faster if customers have confidence in their understanding of its purpose and value. The marketability of leading/bleeding edge tools is a critical driver, and it merits deeper consideration as a factor. Regards, Rick
Attachment:
rick.vcf
Description: Binary data
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Venting, Paul Prescod | Thread | RE:venting, Bovone Stefano |
Re: Venting, Guy_Murphy | Date | RE:venting, Bovone Stefano |
Month |