[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: inconsistencies between XSL and XLL

---

---

I hear you discussing information from the XML Linking Language 
(XLink) WD [1] and Associating stylesheets with XML documents PR [2].
While your observation may be a reasonable one to raise, I don't see
that this has anything to do with XSL (as implied by the subject
of this message and the mailing list to which you sent it).  Am I
missing something?

paul

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xlink
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/PR-xml-stylesheet

At 22:47 1999 01 29 -0500, Didier PH Martin wrote:
>The whole exercice about the stylesheet processing intruction lead me to see
>a certain inconsistency between XLL and the style sheet PI. In the last
>recommendation, the PI is stated as <?xml-stylesheet....?> and was in the
>previous proposal <?xml:stylesheet...?>. XLL links according to the latest
>posted proposal are expressed as <A xml:link="simple"
>href="http://www.w3.org/">The W3C</A>. Why do we have to kind of notation
>
>a) xml-stylesheet
>b) xml:link
>
>On based on namespaces and the other on ????. Is it because W3 want to
>distinguish processing instructions from other kind of markups? Is the
>implicit rule (but not stated anywhere) that xml-something is for processing
>instructions and xml:something is for other stuff like pointers or other
>kind of objects? Will W3 publish a paper to clarify this?


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

---