[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: dl/dt/dd matching
Subject: Re: dl/dt/dd matching From: ht@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Henry S. Thompson) Date: 16 Jan 1999 11:06:05 +0000 |
"Pawson, David" <DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > James wrote: > > A variation on your suggestion can handle this: > > - next-element() returns the next element sibling; > > - next-element(MatchExpr) returns the next element sibling if it matches > MatchExpr (otherwise nothing) > > > DP: > Naming, suggested improvement. > If it deals with siblings, say so. > next-sibling-element() > and > next-sibling-element(MatchExpr) I'd like to explore combining this with the scanning operation discussed (perhaps only on the WG list) some time back, so that one could specify a path for next-element/previous-element to search along, with siblings merely being the default. The most obvious alternatives are (inverse) pre-order, and elders-only. ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: dl/dt/dd matching, Pawson, David | Thread | Re: dl/dt/dd matching, Oisin McGuinness |
Re: Feature Request - Node Set Proc, James Clark | Date | Invoking XSL from XSL (was: Feature, Boris Moore |
Month |