[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: Existing XSL processors

Subject: Re: Existing XSL processors
From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 00:47:58 +0800

>output.  I am aware that parts of this is being addressed with technology
such
>as James Tauber's FOP, but a more comprehensive solution under an Open
Software
>Licence would certainly be nice.

I intend both for FOP to both become more comprehensive and for it to be
placed under an Open Software Licence.

James
(who deliberated over the cross-posting :-)




 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
Re: Existing XSL processors, (continued) Joel Rosi-Schwartz - Fri, 15 Jan 1999 08:38:23 +0000 Sharon Adler - Thu, 14 Jan 1999 18:36:02 -0500 anette . engel - Fri, 15 Jan 1999 10:46:52 +0100 Joel Rosi-Schwartz - Fri, 15 Jan 1999 13:15:10 +0000 James Tauber - Sat, 16 Jan 1999 00:47:58 +0800 <= Guy_Murphy - Tue, 19 Jan 1999 12:08:32 +0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: Existing XSL processors, Joel Rosi-Schwartz	Thread	Re: Existing XSL processors, Guy_Murphy
XML/MML and XSL processors, David Sloan	Date	Help extending Java environment for, G. Ken Holman
	Month

Re: Existing XSL processors

Products

Features

Shop

Resources

Support

Company