[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: Questions on the new XSL spec (section 2.6)
|
Subject: RE: Questions on the new XSL spec (section 2.6) From: David Schach <davidsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 21:23:50 -0800 |
Thanks for the explanation of match ancestor. > How about id()? Do you support something like foo/id(@ref)? > Yes when it is used in a select or test. foo/id(@ref) is interpreted as id(foo/@ref). I don't think there is a good interpretation when it is used in a match. David XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: Questions on the new XSL spec (, Steve Dahl | Thread | Re: Questions on the new XSL spec (, James Clark |
| Re: Questions on the new XSL spec (, James Clark | Date | Re: Questions on the new XSL spec (, James Clark |
| Month |