[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] Does Saxon support XPath 3.1?
Subject: Re: [xsl] Does Saxon support XPath 3.1? From: "Adam Retter adam.retter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2015 18:09:23 -0000 |
Dmitriy, have you looked at EXSELT? That has XSLT 3.0 support. On 4 July 2015 at 17:39, Dimitre Novatchev dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Florent, > >> you might be interested by the page >> http://w3.org/community/expath/wiki/Engines#Comparison. It might be a bit >> outdated now, the only XPath 3.1 it shows is eXist, but I am sure at least >> BaseX supports it as well, as you said. > > Thank you for this link. > > I believe that what would be most useful, is the data whether and to > what extent a different implementation implements a given W3C > specification. > > Reading this page I was immediately interested in QuiXTools, which is > said to implement XSLT 3.0. However, on its project page: > https://project.inria.fr/quix-tool-suite/quixslt/ , one can read that: > > "Which fragment of XSLT is currently supported by QuiXSLT? > > Syntactically, QuiXSLTfollows the official XSLT W3C Recommendation > (even though it does not implement the full standard) . The current > version of QuiXSLT supports the following elements: > > named templates, > template rules, > instructions call-template, apply-templates, if, choice, for-each, > copy, copy-of, > dynamic content creation instructions: attribute, value-ofb& > > Templates can be called with any number of parameters." > > > So, no specific, new XSLT 3.0 feature is mentioned at all. > > For any specific implementation It would be valuable to have data > whether or not it implements the full set of features and if not, what > features are not implemented. Ultimately, the % of pass/fail for the > available W3C test suits. A link to a user-reviews page would be > useful. > > > Cheers, > Dimitre > > > > On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 5:40 AM, Florent Georges <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Dimitre, >> >> I don't have write access to XSL List anymore, so this most likely will >> not show up on the list, but you might be interested by the page >> http://w3.org/community/expath/wiki/Engines#Comparison. It might be a bit >> outdated now, the only XPath 3.1 it shows is eXist, but I am sure at least >> BaseX supports it as well, as you said. >> >> Any update welcome ;-) >> >> Regards, >> >> -- >> Florent Georges >> http://fgeorges.org/ >> http://h2oconsulting.be/ >> >> >> >> >> >> Le Lundi 29 juin 2015 5h02, "Dimitre Novatchev dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx" >> <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a C)crit : >> >> >> >> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Liam R. E. Quin <liam@xxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Mon, 2015-06-29 at 00:22 +0000, Dimitre Novatchev dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx >>> wrote: >>>> I apologize if I am asking for something obvious, but >>>> straightforward searching didn't locate any statements about Saxon >>>> support (implementation) of the XPath 3.1 W3C Standard. >>> >>> XPath 3.1 is not yet a W3C Recommendation (the nearest thing we have >>> to a standard). >> >> Thanks Liam, >> >> Yes, but XPath 3.1 is (since December 2014) a Candidate >> Recommendation, which is the closest point to becoming a >> Recommendation :) >> >> >>> >>> My understanding is that the commercial version of Saxon may have 3.1 >>> support, but that's probably a question for the Saxon mailing list. >> >> I deliberately asked the question in the xsl-list, because most >> readers are using Saxon as their preferred XSLT processor. I am also >> discussing alternatives to Saxon, in case it doesn't provide support >> for XPath 3.1 (such as using BaseX)-- and thus the topic is wider than >> just Saxon. >> >>> >>> There may also be support for XPath 3.1 and XQuery 3.1 in eXist, but >>> I'm not certain. >> >> Wasn't there some page with comparison of how different implementation >> support different versions of XPath? I vaguely remember that in the >> past there was such a page that provided information how different >> XSLT processors were passing the W3C Test Suite -- and this directly >> correlates to their compliants to the respective standard. >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Dimitre >> >> >> > -- Adam Retter skype: adam.retter tweet: adamretter http://www.adamretter.org.uk
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Does Saxon support XPath , Dimitre Novatchev dn | Thread | Re: [xsl] Does Saxon support XPath , Dimitre Novatchev dn |
Re: [xsl] Does Saxon support XPath , Dimitre Novatchev dn | Date | Re: [xsl] Does Saxon support XPath , Dimitre Novatchev dn |
Month |