[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] Increasing sequence ?
Subject: Re: [xsl] Increasing sequence ? From: "Michael Kay mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 10:17:17 -0000 |
> Hit the send button too early. > > With another sequence: > > (1, 0, 2 to 100000) > > increasing2() takes 77ms, while the recursive increasing() takes only > 4.45ms -- or that means the recursive function is about 17 times > faster. > > > Maybe the BaseX developers didn't implement proper short-cutting for > the "every" expression. > Or maybe they expand 2 to 100000 into an actual list of 99999 numbers prematurely. Michael Kay Saxonica
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Increasing sequence ?, Dimitre Novatchev dn | Thread | Re: [xsl] Increasing sequence ?, Dimitre Novatchev dn |
Re: [xsl] Increasing sequence ?, Dimitre Novatchev dn | Date | Re: [xsl] Increasing sequence ?, Dimitre Novatchev dn |
Month |