[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] Increasing sequence ?
Subject: Re: [xsl] Increasing sequence ? From: "Dimitre Novatchev dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 19:49:05 -0000 |
Leo, > I tried it with an xQuery function (I know it does not belong here ;-)) and > had a stack problem with a sequence with 10000 elements ;-( (Oxygen 16.1) I think I know what the issue is most likely. I can investigate further only after I am back at home from work, but my guess is that if you use BaseX, there will be no SO problem. Cheers, Dimitre On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Leo Studer leo.studer@xxxxxxxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Dimitre > > the question came up in a XML Schema 1.1 assertion where only xPath 2.0 > expressions are allowed. > > Dimitre, yes, this is nice, however can not be used in xsd:assertions. > > > Do you mean that you cannot use an XSLT function? > > And there is a stack problem with large sequences. > > > I tried it with an xQuery function (I know it does not belong here ;-)) and > had a stack problem with a sequence with 10000 elements ;-( (Oxygen 16.1) > > > There shouldn't be such problem with this particular function, if the > XSLT processor recognizes and optimizes tail recursion. > > > Always > Leo > XSL-List info and archive > EasyUnsubscribe (by email)
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Increasing sequence ?, Leo Studer leo.stude | Thread | Re: [xsl] Increasing sequence ?, Dimitre Novatchev dn |
Re: [xsl] Increasing sequence ?, Leo Studer leo.stude | Date | Re: [xsl] Increasing sequence ?, Dimitre Novatchev dn |
Month |
Keywords