[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

[xsl] Algorithm akin to namespace fixup for xslt?


Subject: [xsl] Algorithm akin to namespace fixup for xslt?
From: "Alan Painter alan.painter@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 08:43:37 -0000

Dear xslt community members,

I'm wondering if there isn't a known, public algorithm ), ideally in XSLT
itself, for doing something akin to "namespace fixup".

Given a deep tree of nodes, each element node within a namespace. A child
node inherits its parent namespace unless it specifically overrides it. Is
there an algorithm for choosing the "best" or perhaps "sparsest" set of
overriding namespace declarations, hence taking the most advantage of
inheritance.

My application of this algorithm isn't for namespaces but seems very
similar in requirement.

Thanks for any pointers or suggestions
On Feb 5, 2015 8:31 PM, "Mailing Lists Mail daktapaal@xxxxxxxxx" <
xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

<xsl:variable name="foo" select = "xxx"/>

  <xsl:variable name="bar" select= "yyy"/>

<xsl:variable name="foo1"/>

  <xsl:variable name="bar1" select= "'world'"/>


  <xsl:value-of select="($foo,$bar)[1]"/> <!--first-->

    <xsl:value-of select="(string($foo1),$bar1)[1]"/><!--Second-->

First worked but second did not work
I was expecting "World" to be output to the result ..


On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Michael Kay mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx
<xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> If $a and $b have cardinality zero-or-one then ($a, $b)[1] does what you
want (and is a common programming idiom).
>
> But be careful, it doesn't work if either $a or $b can contain more than
one item.
>
> Also, it tests whether $a exists, which isn't the same as your example of
testing the effective boolean value of string(@a).
>
> Michael Kay
> Saxonica
> mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> +44 (0) 118 946 5893
>
>
>
>
> On 5 Feb 2015, at 18:32, Mailing Lists Mail daktapaal@xxxxxxxxx <
xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Hey All,
>> I have a logic that says :
>>
>> if $a found , then use it, else use $b.
>> I can do this like
>>
>> <xsl:value-of select = "if(string($a)) then $a else $b"/>
>>
>> Can I do something like
>> <xsl:value-of select = "($a,$b)[1]"/>
>>
>> Not sure , when this will work and when it wont. Or will it work at all..


Current Thread
Keywords