[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: [xsl] question about function type example in XPath 3.0 spec


Subject: Re: [xsl] question about function type example in XPath 3.0 spec
From: "Dimitre Novatchev dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 16:01:27 -0000

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Martin Honnen martin.honnen@xxxxxx
<xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What is "int" in there, just a hypotetical unqualified type name for the
> purpose of the example? Or should it be "xs:int" to reference the W3C XML
> schema type?



It isn't necessary to specify "xs:int" . If the default namespace is
the XML Schema namespace, then  the types of the arguments and return
value of any function of the type:
    function(int, int) as int

is the XML Schema xs:int data-type.

The above type certainly is a bit ambiguous without knowing the context.


-- 
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
---------------------------------------
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
---------------------------------------
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
-------------------------------------
Never fight an inanimate object
-------------------------------------
To avoid situations in which you might make mistakes may be the
biggest mistake of all
------------------------------------
Quality means doing it right when no one is looking.
-------------------------------------
You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
you're doing is work or play
-------------------------------------
To achieve the impossible dream, try going to sleep.
-------------------------------------
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
-------------------------------------
Typing monkeys will write all Shakespeare's works in 200yrs.Will they
write all patents, too? :)
-------------------------------------
I finally figured out the only reason to be alive is to enjoy it.


Current Thread
Keywords