[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: [xsl] F & O 3.0 -- serialize() function question


Subject: Re: [xsl] F & O 3.0 -- serialize() function question
From: "Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.laun@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2014 19:54:50 -0000

To be more precise: the result of a serialization could be encoded in
some other character set as well.
-W

On 01/06/2014, Dimitre Novatchev dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx
<xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.laun@xxxxxxxxx
> <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> To me, this means that the result is, in any case, a sequence of
>> Unicode characters, and not one of octets in any of the possible
>> (UTF-x) encodings.
>
>
> Aren't utf-8 - encoded characters just  "Unicode characters" ?
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Dimitre Novatchev
> ---------------------------------------
> Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
> ---------------------------------------
> To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
> -------------------------------------
> Never fight an inanimate object
> -------------------------------------
> To avoid situations in which you might make mistakes may be the
> biggest mistake of all
> ------------------------------------
> Quality means doing it right when no one is looking.
> -------------------------------------
> You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
> you're doing is work or play
> -------------------------------------
> To achieve the impossible dream, try going to sleep.
> -------------------------------------
> Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
> -------------------------------------
> Typing monkeys will write all Shakespeare's works in 200yrs.Will they
> write all patents, too? :)
> -------------------------------------
> I finally figured out the only reason to be alive is to enjoy it.


Current Thread
Keywords