[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: [xsl] Civil Discourse Required on XSL-List
Subject: RE: [xsl] Civil Discourse Required on XSL-List From: "Geert Josten" <geert.josten@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 11:04:14 +0100 |
+1.. Simply start new threads for philosophical debates.. ;) > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Michael Kay [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx] > Verzonden: maandag 24 maart 2014 18:30 > Aan: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Onderwerp: Re: [xsl] Civil Discourse Required on XSL-List > > I think one of the ways in which we behaved badly recently was that a visitor > (Heiko Niemann) asked a perfectly reasonable "how do I do X" question, and > we collectively hijacked the thread and used it for a discussion about the > design of the language and the philosophy of language design, a discussion > in which the originator apparently showed no interest and which indeed did > not do much to help in answering his question. Of course, this happens; > conversations take unpredictable turns, but I think we should take a little bit > more responsibility to be inclusive of the person who started the > conversation. > > Michael Kay > Saxonica
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Civil Discourse Required , Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] Managing debug logging in com, Eliot Kimber |
Re: [xsl] Managing debug logging in, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] Managing debug logging in, Alex Muir |
Month |