[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

[xsl] Re: Escaped canonical XML?

Subject: [xsl] Re: Escaped canonical XML?
From: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 13:42:02 +0100

Hey again. Did my email got lost or has nobody come across a similar
problem? Maybe I'm using a wrong approach?

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Martynas JuseviD
<martynas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hey,
> I have a stylesheet that transforms TEI to TriX, which is currently
> the only (and non-standard) XML serialization for RDF datasets with
> named graphs [1].
> The issue is that TriX format expects escaped XML literals, while RDF
> data model expects canonical XML literals. How do I produce a
> combination of both?
> Currently I'm using xml-to-string by Evan Lenz [2] to escape the XML
> literals. I wonder if it can be modified to produce a canonical
> version as well? There is $use-empty-syntax parameter that might help,
> but there are many more rules in canonicalization, as far as I know.
> Suggestions appreciated.
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/
> [2] http://lenzconsulting.com/xml-to-string/
> Martynas
> graphityhq.com

Current Thread