[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
[xsl] Re: Escaped canonical XML?
Subject: [xsl] Re: Escaped canonical XML? From: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 13:42:02 +0100 |
Hey again. Did my email got lost or has nobody come across a similar problem? Maybe I'm using a wrong approach? On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Martynas JuseviD ius <martynas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hey, > > I have a stylesheet that transforms TEI to TriX, which is currently > the only (and non-standard) XML serialization for RDF datasets with > named graphs [1]. > > The issue is that TriX format expects escaped XML literals, while RDF > data model expects canonical XML literals. How do I produce a > combination of both? > > Currently I'm using xml-to-string by Evan Lenz [2] to escape the XML > literals. I wonder if it can be modified to produce a canonical > version as well? There is $use-empty-syntax parameter that might help, > but there are many more rules in canonicalization, as far as I know. > > Suggestions appreciated. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/ > [2] http://lenzconsulting.com/xml-to-string/ > > Martynas > graphityhq.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Escaped canonical XML?, Martynas Jusevičius | Thread | Re: [xsl] Escaped canonical XML?, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] Comparing documents: what, Wolfgang Laun | Date | Re: [xsl] Escaped canonical XML?, Michael Kay |
Month |
Keywords