[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?

Subject: Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?
From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 14:08:23 -0800

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Piotr BaEski <bansp@xxxxx> wrote:
> But to speak of a node nested inside another... urgle. Sounds wrongish.

Yes, if we speak about *trees*

However, with *streaming*  the string representation of a descendant
node (and of whole subtrees) is actually, physically nested in the
string representation of the root of the tree (it is *physically*
between the start-tag and the end-tag of the root element).

As we are struggling to understand streaming better, it is good to use
terminology that is best reflecting the actual streaming -- thus
"nested" is a precise reflection of the real, physical nesting during

Dimitre Novatchev
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
Never fight an inanimate object
To avoid situations in which you might make mistakes may be the
biggest mistake of all
Quality means doing it right when no one is looking.
You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
you're doing is work or play
To achieve the impossible dream, try going to sleep.
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
Typing monkeys will write all Shakespeare's works in 200yrs.Will they
write all patents, too? :)
I finally figured out the only reason to be alive is to enjoy it.

Current Thread