[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

RE: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?


Subject: RE: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?
From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 21:20:58 +0000

I vote for "nested".

Sample usage:

	//x is a "crawling" expression - one that selects
	nodes which may nest inside one another.

/Roger


Current Thread