[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?

Subject: Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?
From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 10:11:00 +0000

Yesterday Michael Kay wrote:

	//x is a "crawling" expression - one that selects
	nodes which may overlap each other.

Michael, I do not understand what you mean by "overlap". It seems like an
important concept, since you have used that word repeatedly.

Would you give an example of overlapping nodes please?

/Roger

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, (continued) Dimitre Novatchev - 12 Jan 2014 23:36:32 -0000 Michael Kay - 13 Jan 2014 00:24:21 -0000 Dimitre Novatchev - 12 Jan 2014 21:38:15 -0000 Dimitre Novatchev - 12 Jan 2014 21:35:44 -0000 Costello, Roger L. - 14 Jan 2014 10:11:13 -0000 <= John Lumley - 14 Jan 2014 10:30:33 -0000 John Lumley - 14 Jan 2014 10:43:45 -0000 Peter West - 14 Jan 2014 11:59:28 -0000 Michael Kay - 14 Jan 2014 12:26:19 -0000

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, (continued)
- Costello, Roger L. - 14 Jan 2014 10:11:13 -0000 <=
  - John Lumley - 14 Jan 2014 10:30:33 -0000
    - John Lumley - 14 Jan 2014 10:43:45 -0000
    - Peter West - 14 Jan 2014 11:59:28 -0000
  - Michael Kay - 14 Jan 2014 12:26:19 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] Does the count() function, Dimitre Novatchev	Thread	Re: [xsl] Does the count() function, John Lumley
[no subject], Unknown	Date	Re: [xsl] Does the count() function, John Lumley
	Month

Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?

Products

Features

Shop

Resources

Support

Company