[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: [xsl] Streaming best practice: no user-defined functions with node parameters ... Do you agree?


Subject: Re: [xsl] Streaming best practice: no user-defined functions with node parameters ... Do you agree?
From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:10:01 -0500

On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> But does it mean we won't be able (when
>> streaming) to call functions even with temporary trees or snapshots?
>
> In the current draft (which we're working hard to get the final bugs out
of...) we've re-introduced a kind of data-flow analysis that enables us to
distinguish statically whether the node being passed to a function is a
streamed node or not. There's no problem with passing "ordinary" nodes to a
function (or template) parameter, it's only streamed nodes that are
problematic.

Yes, excellent. Distinguishing between streamed nodes and nodes in
trees that are entirely accessible makes sense.

Cheers, Wendell


Current Thread