[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] Re: xsl 2.0?
|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: xsl 2.0? From: Liam R E Quin <liam@xxxxxx> Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 20:40:03 +0800 |
On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 09:20 -0500, Charlie wrote: > I've followed this thread with great interest. > > I'm the in-house XML Developer for a large US defense company. XSL-FO is > used extensively in military technical publishing. We have complex > documents with extensive cross referencing and strict pagination > requirements. I cannot see CSS ever supporting those requirements. Since I don't think any MIL-STD people turn up at CSS meetings, I agree it's unlikely, but you should not be too dismissive. I remember an accountant at a former employer telling me that credit card companies would never accept payments over the Internet. -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| [xsl] Re: xsl 2.0?, Charlie | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: xsl 2.0?, Paul Tyson |
| [xsl] any plans to port Saxon CE to, Lars Huttar | Date | Re: [xsl] any plans to port Saxon C, Michael Kay |
| Month |
Keywords