[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: [xsl] xsl 2.0?


Subject: Re: [xsl] xsl 2.0?
From: Peter Flynn <pflynn@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 14:05:28 +0000

On 02/11/13 07:23, Toshihiko Makita wrote:
[...]
3. I beleive that XSL-FO is most suitable techinology for formatting XML
documents. Does CSS techinology become the complete alternative of the
XSL-FO?

Bear in mind that you can also produce PDF by using XSLT[2] to generate LaTeX. I know this is heresy to many people here, but it provides a useful path to PDF that is unencumbered, and allows re-use of the significant body of knowledge of documents and their formatting requirements that is a part of the LaTeX ecosystem.


///Peter


Current Thread
Keywords
xml