[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: [xsl] Only child test

Subject: Re: [xsl] Only child test
From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 07:07:24 -0700


This is the  first expression I thought about -- then saw that
PQQP5QP;P0P2 P!P5P4P>P2 has already offered it.


On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Karl Stubsjoen <kstubs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Just curious how other's might approach a test to determine if the
> current node is *not* an only child. This works fine but it feels a
> little heavy to me.  Thoughts?
>                 <xsl:if test="(count(preceding-sibling::*) +
> count(following-sibling::*)) &gt; 1">
>                     <hr/>
>                 </xsl:if>

Dimitre Novatchev
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
Never fight an inanimate object
To avoid situations in which you might make mistakes may be the
biggest mistake of all
Quality means doing it right when no one is looking.
You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
you're doing is work or play
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
Typing monkeys will write all Shakespeare's works in 200yrs.Will they
write all patents, too? :)
I finally figured out the only reason to be alive is to enjoy it.

Current Thread