[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] Only child test
Subject: Re: [xsl] Only child test From: Вячеслав Седов <schematronic@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 12:42:01 +0400 |
can be test="../*[2]" faster? 2013/10/10 Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > count(../* gt 1) > > or if you know that you're processing all siblings at the time, > > last() gt 1 > > Michael Kay > Saxonica > > > On 10 Oct 2013, at 05:38, Karl Stubsjoen wrote: > >> Just curious how other's might approach a test to determine if the >> current node is *not* an only child. This works fine but it feels a >> little heavy to me. Thoughts? >> >> <xsl:if test="(count(preceding-sibling::*) + >> count(following-sibling::*)) > 1"> >> <hr/> >> </xsl:if>
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Only child test, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] Only child test, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] Only child test, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] Only child test, David Carlisle |
Month |