[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: [xsl] A nice way to implement the ANDing of the comparison of pairs of items in a sequence?


Subject: Re: [xsl] A nice way to implement the ANDing of the comparison of pairs of items in a sequence?
From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 21:40:50 -0400

At 2013-09-05 16:56 -0400, Michael Dykman wrote:
Glad to see this issue at hand reolved so elegantly but if I might
clarify one digressional point:

DeMorgan's Law: is not
  "AND" is the same as "not( OR )"
but rather
 "AND" is the same as "not( NOR )"

Granted! Thank you for the clarification. Thus, what I was doing was correct for the requirement, but I shouldn't have labeled it DeMorgan's.


. . . . . . . . Ken

On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 4:24 PM, G. Ken Holman
<gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think Michael wins this one!
>
>
> . . . . . . Ken
>
> At 2013-09-05 21:06 +0100, Michael Kay wrote:
>>
>> How about
>>
>> deep-equal($v[position() mod 2 = 0], $v[position() mod 2 = 1])
>>
>> Michael Kay
>> Saxonica
>


--
Public XSLT, XSL-FO, and UBL classes in the Netherlands     Oct 2013 |
Public XSLT, XSL-FO, UBL and code list classes in Australia Oct 2013 |
Contact us for world-wide XML consulting and instructor-led training |
Free 5-hour lecture: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/links/udemy.htm |
Crane Softwrights Ltd.            http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/ |
G. Ken Holman                   mailto:gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Google+ profile: https://plus.google.com/116832879756988317389/about |
Legal business disclaimers:    http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal |


Current Thread
Keywords