[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
On 21/05/2013 17:12, Evan Lenz wrote:
well yes matching on the original node would be reasonably intuitive if the for-each is iterating over atomic items, but I think it would be pretty odd to do that if it was iterating over nodes, and the sequence might be a mix of both and you can't statically tell which is which so
not allowing it seems a safe first step:-)
David
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Re: [xsl] Equal rights for xsl:next-match & co
Subject: Re: [xsl] Equal rights for xsl:next-match & co From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 17:25:02 +0100 |
On 21/05/2013 17:12, Evan Lenz wrote:
<xsl:for-each select="1 to 10"> <xsl:next-match/> </xsl:for-each>
well yes matching on the original node would be reasonably intuitive if the for-each is iterating over atomic items, but I think it would be pretty odd to do that if it was iterating over nodes, and the sequence might be a mix of both and you can't statically tell which is which so
not allowing it seems a safe first step:-)
David
________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Equal rights for xsl:next, Evan Lenz | Thread | Re: [xsl] Equal rights for xsl:next, Evan Lenz |
Re: [xsl] Equal rights for xsl:next, Evan Lenz | Date | Re: [xsl] Equal rights for xsl:next, Evan Lenz |
Month |