[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: [xsl] fo:multi-switch or alternative

Subject: Re: [xsl] fo:multi-switch or alternative
From: Jesper Tverskov <jesper.tverskov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 08:15:35 +0200

Kevin Brown wrote:
> Question: Can the table + content be in its own page-sequence?
> If the answer is yes, I do not see why you could not use ...
> Or, if preferred without "only" which I forget may also be a 1.1 concept:

Sounds interesting but I would need more help. If you have the time,
please modify Ken's solution so it not only works with XSL-FO 1.1 but
also with XSL-FO 1.0.

Jesper Tverskov

Current Thread