[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
We (on the XSLT side) once encountered a case where there was ambiguity as where a definition ended, so we changed the notation to make sure that didn't happen (though it causes some problems because we can't handle a multi-paragraph definition). WGs typically do such things without asking other WGs for permission/consensus.
On 16/09/2012 15:28, Costello, Roger L. wrote:
Re: [xsl] Why do the XSLT and XML Schema specifications use different notations for Definitions?
|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Why do the XSLT and XML Schema specifications use different notations for Definitions? From: Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 23:04:15 +0100 |
We (on the XSLT side) once encountered a case where there was ambiguity as where a definition ended, so we changed the notation to make sure that didn't happen (though it causes some problems because we can't handle a multi-paragraph definition). WGs typically do such things without asking other WGs for permission/consensus.
Michael Kay Saxonica
On 16/09/2012 15:28, Costello, Roger L. wrote:
Hi Folks,
In the XSLT 3.0 specification it uses this notation for definitions:
[Definition: blah, blah, blah.]
In the XML Schema 1.1 specification it uses this notation for definitions:
[Definition:] blah, blah, blah.
Why is there a difference in notation?
/roger
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Why do the XSLT and XML S, David Carlisle | Thread | [xsl] Using barcode markup in Saxon, Jesper Tverskov |
| Re: [xsl] Why do the XSLT and XML S, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] Using barcode markup in S, Marc |
| Month |
Keywords