[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: [xsl] Does use a lot of memory? Is there an alternative that is more efficient?


Subject: Re: [xsl] Does <xsl:copy> use a lot of memory? Is there an alternative that is more efficient?
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 16:06:13 +0200

On 03/09/2012 15:57, Costello, Roger L. wrote:
In other words, if I don't immediately output the results of
xsl:copy, then memory consumption grows and grows. Yes?

Potentially yes. But not really because of the xsl:copy, if you changed it to xsl:sequence you'd probably get the same behaviour. If you are using lots of variables and don't want them to take up space, you need to have a very good idea how your xslt processor's optimiser works and constrain your usage to uses which the optimiser can optimise away....

David


-- google plus: https:/profiles.google.com/d.p.carlisle

________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________



Current Thread
Keywords