Re: [xsl] how with xPath 1

Subject: Re: [xsl] how with xPath 1
From: Leo Studer <leo.studer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 18:39:55 +0200

Thank you Michael

this makes complete sense. Indeed my question is a first order problem.

Always
Leo


> On 15.04.2012, at 18:34, Michael Kay wrote:
>
> XPath 1.0 is not "relationally complete", that is, there are queries
expressible in first-order predicate calculus that are not expressible in
XPath 1.0. This might well be one of them. In such cases you need some
assistance from the host language (e.g. XSLT or Java).
>
> Michael Kay
> Saxonica

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] how with xPath 1, (continued) Leo Studer - 15 Apr 2012 07:50:28 -0000 Chris Maloney - 15 Apr 2012 13:15:13 -0000 Leo Studer - 15 Apr 2012 13:28:13 -0000 Michael Kay - 15 Apr 2012 16:35:05 -0000 Leo Studer - 15 Apr 2012 16:40:05 -0000 <= Liam R E Quin - 15 Apr 2012 18:51:52 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] how with xPath 1, Michael Kay	Thread	Re: [xsl] how with xPath 1, Liam R E Quin
Re: [xsl] how with xPath 1, Michael Kay	Date	Re: [xsl] how with xPath 1, Liam R E Quin
	Month

Keywords

xpath
xslt

	XML Editor \| XML Author \| WYSIWYG Editors \| Schema Editor \| XSD Documentation \| XSL/XSLT Editor \| XQuery \| XML Databases \| SVN Client © 2002-2011 SyncRO Soft Ltd. All rights reserved. \| Sitemap \| Privacy Policy \| This website was created & generated with <oXygen/>®XML Editor

xml editor

Re: [xsl] how with xPath 1