[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
On 21.2.2012 16:53, Syd Bauman wrote:
I am sorry for asking a bad question, but is there any real issue with what I was saying, aside from the terminological mistake (and I was a lawyer in my previous life, so I do not take terminology lightly)?
Give a man a regular expression and he?ll match a string?
teach him to make his own regular expressions and you?ve got a man with problems.
-- yakugo in http://regex.info/blog/2006-09-15/247#comment-3022
Re: [xsl] overlap nomenclature
Subject: Re: [xsl] overlap nomenclature From: Matěj Cepl <mcepl@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:15:42 +0100 |
On 21.2.2012 16:53, Syd Bauman wrote:
Mat?j Cepl provides a concise description of the overlap problem in XML, but the solution he describes is NOT the use of milestone elements. He describes HORSE (hierarchical overlap representation using same element, but empty). Both methods make use of empty elements, but they are different.
I am sorry for asking a bad question, but is there any real issue with what I was saying, aside from the terminological mistake (and I was a lawyer in my previous life, so I do not take terminology lightly)?
MatDj -- http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/, Jabber: mcepl<at>ceplovi.cz GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC
Give a man a regular expression and he?ll match a string?
teach him to make his own regular expressions and you?ve got a man with problems.
-- yakugo in http://regex.info/blog/2006-09-15/247#comment-3022
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] overlap nomenclature, Syd Bauman | Thread | Re: [xsl] overlap nomenclature, Syd Bauman |
[xsl] overlap nomenclature, Syd Bauman | Date | Re: [xsl] overlap nomenclature, Syd Bauman |
Month |
Keywords