[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: [xsl] Rule of thumb: Are XPath 2.0 or XSLT 2.0 constructs faster?


Subject: Re: [xsl] Rule of thumb: Are XPath 2.0 or XSLT 2.0 constructs faster?
From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 06:02:53 -0800

> Interesting.  How exactly does that work?

The best answer is: Try it.

The "current statement" marker moves from one subexpression to another
when stepping through.

Cheers,
Dimitre


On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 5:53 AM, TW <zupftom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2012/2/9 Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>> I like pure XPath solutions because they are less verbose, but I find
>>> "full" XSLT less restricting and easier to debug (especially when I
>>> want to check what variable holds what value).
>>
>> Since about 6 months oXygen has implemented stepping through an XPath
>> expression (not sure about setting breakpoints). Thus there should be
>> no difference in debugging XPath code and XSLT code with oXygen.
>>
>
> Interesting. B How exactly does that work?
>
> Thomas W.
>



--
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
---------------------------------------
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
---------------------------------------
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
-------------------------------------
Never fight an inanimate object
-------------------------------------
To avoid situations in which you might make mistakes may be the
biggest mistake of all
------------------------------------
Quality means doing it right when no one is looking.
-------------------------------------
You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
you're doing is work or play
-------------------------------------
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
-------------------------------------
I finally figured out the only reason to be alive is to enjoy it.


Current Thread
Keywords