[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: [xsl] Rule of thumb: Are XPath 2.0 or XSLT 2.0 constructs faster?


Subject: Re: [xsl] Rule of thumb: Are XPath 2.0 or XSLT 2.0 constructs faster?
From: TW <zupftom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 14:53:02 +0100

2012/2/9 Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> I like pure XPath solutions because they are less verbose, but I find
>> "full" XSLT less restricting and easier to debug (especially when I
>> want to check what variable holds what value).
>
> Since about 6 months oXygen has implemented stepping through an XPath
> expression (not sure about setting breakpoints). Thus there should be
> no difference in debugging XPath code and XSLT code with oXygen.
>

Interesting.  How exactly does that work?

Thomas W.


Current Thread
Keywords