[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
http://mail.explain.com.au/pipermail/libx/2011-September/000004.html
I don't think you can write an XSLT 2.0 processor and have an unrelated day job. Most of the coding for Saxon's XSLT 2.0 processor was done when I was employed by Software AG full time on standards work, and I was spending about half my time on the standards and half on Saxon, with the full encouragement of my employer. I think we can forget about this project unless it finds a sponsor.
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2 processors
Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 2 processors From: Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:34:47 +0000 |
This posting sort of sums it up:Does anyone know if PHP has it?Sadly, not yet (except via the Java bridge). No recent news from the LIBX* project: http://www.explain.com.au/libx/. Perhaps Steve Ball found something else to do with his weekends. I think the days of hobbyist implementations of these technologies are past.
http://mail.explain.com.au/pipermail/libx/2011-September/000004.html
I don't think you can write an XSLT 2.0 processor and have an unrelated day job. Most of the coding for Saxon's XSLT 2.0 processor was done when I was employed by Software AG full time on standards work, and I was spending about half my time on the standards and half on Saxon, with the full encouragement of my employer. I think we can forget about this project unless it finds a sponsor.
Michael Kay Saxonica
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2 processors, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT 2 processors, Liam R E Quin |
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2 processors, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] Rule of thumb: Are XPath , Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |
Keywords