[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Hi,
At 09:40 PM 11/11/2010, you wrote:
Hm. So does it have the lowest if and only if it doesn't have any of these, or ":" (indicating a namespace prefix), but it does have "*" or "()"? (indicating a wildcard or kind test?)
Re: [xsl] [XSLT 1.0] Q: recursively eliminate empty nodes
Subject: Re: [xsl] [XSLT 1.0] Q: recursively eliminate empty nodes From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:54:27 -0500 |
Hi,
At 09:40 PM 11/11/2010, you wrote:
On 11/10/10 1:16 AM, Michael Kay wrote:A rule I find easy to remember is that a pattern has the highest default priority (0.5) if and only if it contains a "/", "//", or "[..]"
Priority +0.5 is used for everything else: typically, but not exclusively, when the pattern includes filters or constraints on the node's ancestory.
Hm. So does it have the lowest if and only if it doesn't have any of these, or ":" (indicating a namespace prefix), but it does have "*" or "()"? (indicating a wildcard or kind test?)
Cheers, Wendell
====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] [XSLT 1.0] Q: recursively, Evan Lenz | Thread | Re: [xsl] [XSLT 1.0] Q: recursively, Evan Lenz |
Re: [xsl] Sorting using more than v, Wendell Piez | Date | [xsl] getting the child element bas, ram |
Month |
Keywords