[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
On 08/11/2010 19:13, Andriy Gerasika wrote:
why is -9 good practice rather that -188 or -123.456, or, as in the posted code, -0.5 ? what is so special about -9 that you say it _should_ be used?
But there was no other templates of the same priority in the supplied code.
David
Re: [xsl] [XSLT 1.0] Q: recursively eliminate empty nodes
Subject: Re: [xsl] [XSLT 1.0] Q: recursively eliminate empty nodes From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 21:20:57 +0000 |
On 08/11/2010 19:13, Andriy Gerasika wrote:
good practice.
why is -9 good practice rather that -188 or -123.456, or, as in the posted code, -0.5 ? what is so special about -9 that you say it _should_ be used?
> > Saxon will say Recoverable Error if two template match the same node.
But there was no other templates of the same priority in the supplied code.
David
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] [XSLT 1.0] Q: recursively, Andriy Gerasika | Thread | Re: [xsl] [XSLT 1.0] Q: recursively, Andriy Gerasika |
Re: [xsl] [XSLT 1.0] Q: recursively, Hermann Stamm-Wilbra | Date | Re: [xsl] [XSLT 1.0] Q: recursively, Andriy Gerasika |
Month |