[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
In addition, especially for grouping problems it is interesting to know whether you are restricted to XSLT 1.0 or whether an XSLT 2.0 solution will be acceptable.
If you cannot send real input data because it is either confidential or its overall complexity masks the actual problem, it is good to make up some sample data, which (this is important) should be well-formed XML.
For example:
Then I see at least two different approaches:
1. Just sort the items in a flat structure, but sorted for Classification first, then for Area, etc.
2. Also create some hierarchy that reflects the grouping, for example:
and so on.
Gerrit
On 06.11.2010 10:46, Michael Kay wrote:
Re: [xsl] multi level sorting method
Subject: Re: [xsl] multi level sorting method From: "Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex" <gerrit.imsieke@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 11:03:28 +0100 |
In addition, especially for grouping problems it is interesting to know whether you are restricted to XSLT 1.0 or whether an XSLT 2.0 solution will be acceptable.
If you cannot send real input data because it is either confidential or its overall complexity masks the actual problem, it is good to make up some sample data, which (this is important) should be well-formed XML.
For example:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <data> <item> <Classification>A</Classification> <Area>north</Area> <Customer>Joe</Customer> <Street1>a</Street1> <Street2>b</Street2> <Street3>c</Street3> </item> <item> <Classification>A</Classification> <Area>south</Area> <Customer>Jim</Customer> <Street1>f</Street1> <Street2>e</Street2> <Street3>d</Street3> </item> <item> <Classification>C</Classification> <Area>west</Area> <Customer>John</Customer> <Street1>k</Street1> <Street2>h</Street2> <Street3>i</Street3> </item> <item> <Classification>B</Classification> <Area>south</Area> <Customer>Bob</Customer> <Street1>o</Street1> <Street2>n</Street2> <Street3>m</Street3> </item> <item> <Classification>A</Classification> <Area>north</Area> <Customer>Ignatius</Customer> <Street1>q</Street1> <Street2>p</Street2> <Street3>r</Street3> </item> <item> <Classification>A</Classification> <Area>north</Area> <Customer>Joe</Customer> <Street1>x</Street1> <Street2>y</Street2> <Street3>z</Street3> </item> <item> <Classification>A</Classification> <Area>west</Area> <Customer>Linda</Customer> <Street1>u</Street1> <Street2>v</Street2> <Street3>w</Street3> </item> <item> <Classification>B</Classification> <Area>center</Area> <Customer>Mary</Customer> <Street1>a</Street1> <Street2>a</Street2> <Street3>a</Street3> </item> </data>
Then I see at least two different approaches:
1. Just sort the items in a flat structure, but sorted for Classification first, then for Area, etc.
2. Also create some hierarchy that reflects the grouping, for example:
<data> <group by="Classification" grouping-key="A"> <group by="Area" grouping-key="north"> <group by="Customer" grouping-key="Ignatius"> <group by="Street1" grouping-key="q"> <group by="Street2" grouping-key="p"> <group by="Street3" grouping-key="r"> <item> <Classification>A</Classification> <Area>north</Area> <Customer>Ignatius</Customer> <Street1>q</Street1> <Street2>p</Street2> <Street3>r</Street3> </item> </group> </group> </group> </group> <group by="Customer" grouping-key="Joe"> <group by="Street1" grouping-key="a"> <group by="Street2" grouping-key="b"> <group by="Street3" grouping-key="c"> <item> <Classification>A</Classification> <Area>north</Area> <Customer>Joe</Customer> <Street1>a</Street1> <Street2>b</Street2> <Street3>c</Street3> </item> </group> </group> </group> <group by="Street1" grouping-key="x"> <group by="Street2" grouping-key="y"> <group by="Street3" grouping-key="z"> <item> <Classification>A</Classification> <Area>north</Area> <Customer>Joe</Customer> <Street1>x</Street1> <Street2>y</Street2> <Street3>z</Street3> </item> </group> </group> </group> </group> </group> <group by="Area" grouping-key="south"> <group by="Customer" grouping-key="Jim"> <group by="Street1" grouping-key="f"> <group by="Street2" grouping-key="e"> <group by="Street3" grouping-key="d"> <item> <Classification>A</Classification> <Area>south</Area> <Customer>Jim</Customer> <Street1>f</Street1> <Street2>e</Street2> <Street3>d</Street3> </item> </group> </group> </group> </group> </group> <group by="Area" grouping-key="west"> <group by="Customer" grouping-key="Linda"> ...
and so on.
Gerrit
On 06.11.2010 10:46, Michael Kay wrote:
On 06/11/2010 06:04, ahamed meeran wrote:
Sorry, but I think you'll have to explain your problem more clearly. Perhaps show some real input with data in the records, and the output you want from it. It's also useful to explain how far you got with the problem and where you got stuck.
Michael Kay Saxonica
Hi all
grouping with multi level sorting method.
my xml file:
<Classification><Classification> <Area><Area> <Customer><Customer> <Street1><Street1> <Street2><Street2> <Street3><Street3>
First Classification wise second Area wise third Customer wise then street 1 to 3 all sorting with alphabet
Regards, Ahmed
-- Gerrit Imsieke Geschdftsf|hrer / Managing Director le-tex publishing services GmbH Weissenfelser Str. 84, 04229 Leipzig, Germany Phone +49 341 355356 110, Fax +49 341 355356 510 gerrit.imsieke@xxxxxxxxx, http://www.le-tex.de
Registergericht / Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Leipzig Registernummer / Registration Number: HRB 24930
Geschdftsf|hrer: Gerrit Imsieke, Svea Jelonek, Thomas Schmidt, Dr. Reinhard Vvckler
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] multi level sorting metho, Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] [XSL 1.0] Copy node into of o, Jimenez, Luis |
Re: [xsl] multi level sorting metho, Michael Kay | Date | [xsl] [XSL 1.0] Copy node into of o, Jimenez, Luis |
Month |