[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
You'll see some large numbers, but I'm not sure that's a good thing. The numbers for XSLT 2.0 are probably a lot smaller than the numbers for 1.0, which doesn't exactly mean that XSLT 2.0 is less suited to large-scale programming.
Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?
Subject: Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML? From: Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 09:51:00 +0000 |
It would be interesting to learn about some industry data, such as the number of lines of code resulting from and/or person years spent on a single XSLT project.
You'll see some large numbers, but I'm not sure that's a good thing. The numbers for XSLT 2.0 are probably a lot smaller than the numbers for 1.0, which doesn't exactly mean that XSLT 2.0 is less suited to large-scale programming.
Michael Kay Saxonica
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things miss, Wolfgang Laun | Thread | Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things miss, Wolfgang Laun |
Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things miss, Wolfgang Laun | Date | Re: [xsl] Are there things missing , Stefan Krause |
Month |
Keywords