[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
On 14/05/2010 15:09, Nic Gibson wrote:
I guessed so which means that the information that you gave that it worked if the predicate was removed must also be in error as it would fail in that case as well. If you are using xslt2 you want to put the
document in which to lookup the key as the third argument of key()
David
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Re: [xsl] xsl:key, predicates and documents.
Subject: Re: [xsl] xsl:key, predicates and documents. From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 15:15:27 +0100 |
On 14/05/2010 15:09, Nic Gibson wrote:
No, they're in different documents.
I guessed so which means that the information that you gave that it worked if the predicate was removed must also be in error as it would fail in that case as well. If you are using xslt2 you want to put the
document in which to lookup the key as the third argument of key()
David
________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] xsl:key, predicates and d, Nic Gibson | Thread | [xsl] Re: Dynamic number of sort ke, Fabre Lambeau |
RE: [xsl] xsl:key, predicates and d, Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] Re: Dynamic number of sor, Michael Kay |
Month |