[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
On 07/05/2010 15:29, Michael Kay wrote:
Florent already beat me up over that! Will 2.1 also allow matching on namespace nodes (the other difference, I think)?
David
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Re: [xsl] Is xsl:for-each "syntactic sugar"?
|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Is xsl:for-each "syntactic sugar"? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 07 May 2010 15:33:48 +0100 |
On 07/05/2010 15:29, Michael Kay wrote:
Only if the select expression selects nodes (rather than atomic values). But XSLT 2.1 will remove this remaining difference.
Florent already beat me up over that! Will 2.1 also allow matching on namespace nodes (the other difference, I think)?
David
________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] Is xsl:for-each "syntacti, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] Is xsl:for-each "syntacti, Dimitre Novatchev |
| RE: [xsl] Is xsl:for-each "syntacti, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] Is xsl:for-each "syntacti, Dimitre Novatchev |
| Month |
Keywords