[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
RE: [xsl] toknize() not working with saxon9
Subject: RE: [xsl] toknize() not working with saxon9 From: "Houghton,Andrew" <houghtoa@xxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:09:09 -0400 |
> From: Michael Kay [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 05:01 PM > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [xsl] toknize() not working with saxon9 > > > > > When I run the same program on a single XML file, > > unparsed-entity-uri() works jsut fine. But when I run it in a > > batch mode, it returns an empty string. > > > > OK, that's getting us somewhere. > > What exactly do you mean by "running it in a batch mode"? > > The XML parser you are using, by the way, is the one that comes with > the > Java run-time library that you are using. So we may need to know which > version of Java this is. I would like to suggest that you switch from > the > built-in XML parser (which has lots of bugs, especially in JDK 6) to > Apache > Xerces. You can do that by downloading Apache Xerces and placing the > JAR > file in a directory lib/endorsed in your Java installation. I would second this. Back three or four months ago I had a transform that was causing all sorts of odd behavior and when I switched to using Xerces, all the issues went away *without* any change to the transform. Everytime I download a new JDK my immediate step after installation is to put Xerces in lib/endorsed. Andy.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] toknize() not working wit, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] toknize() not working wit, a kusa |
RE: [xsl] toknize() not working wit, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] Processing node-sets in b, David Carlisle |
Month |
Keywords