[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: [xsl] are all strings in a sequence valid potential QNames


Subject: Re: [xsl] are all strings in a sequence valid potential QNames
From: ac <ac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:25:07 -0500

Hi,

Complaining may not be so constructive but it may seem that expressing opinions and viewpoints with logic, experience, and clear sight may be. The objective should not be determining who is right but rather what is best for most in the long term.

And we may be going off topic.

Cheers,
ac




On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 11:19 +1030, Justin Johansson wrote:

He's mainly on about the conundrum surrounding XML 5th edition to which
my thoughts were:

"As an implementor, this Qname change presents for me yet another hurdle.

It doesn't change it a whole lot from XML 1.1. You were supporting XML 1.1, right? If no, what hope would there have been that you'd have supported an XML 1.2? Even less. If yes, quit complaining :-)

Liam


Current Thread
Keywords
xml