[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
[xsl] Re: [MISC] How was the XSLT 2.0 norm written (tools, format)
Subject: [xsl] Re: [MISC] How was the XSLT 2.0 norm written (tools, format) From: Alain <alainb06@xxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 14:02:59 +0100 |
Thanks Abel, and many thanks for your explainations Michael. I suspected it was a flavour of XML/XSLT. I did the same for my own websites, creating a semi-specific XML grammar (basically XHTML with a limited number of "extensions") and some XSLT customised to my requirements. But for professional use your pointer to a standard such as Docbook is much better that creating something specific from scratch, and I'll definitely promote this kind of solution. I just hope I could also convince my boss to hire someone skilled enough on these publication topics to advise us (better than people who think MS-Word is the best format ever to do such publications!) It would be a precious help as some subject like cross referencing documentation (your explanations) might still be lacking support in Docbook. And there's still issue to handle such as versionning (subversion?), concurrent updating,... Best Regards Alain BENEDETTI
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] [MISC] How was the XSLT 2, Eric J. Bowman | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: [MISC] How was the XS, Dave Pawson |
Re: [xsl] What are the best XSLT 1 , Kevin Jones | Date | Re: [xsl] Re: [MISC] How was the XS, Dave Pawson |
Month |