[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
Re: [xsl] Qualified variable names
Subject: Re: [xsl] Qualified variable names From: Florent Georges <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:36:38 +0100 (CET) |
Andrew Welch wrote: > > Ok, the usual thing then :-) As the context was about "private" > > namespace URIs, I wondered if you meant something else. > I might have missed the point, but weren't the "private" namespaces > simulating Final behaviour? In other words, you used a private > namespace to prevent certain variables etc being overridden? Well, I think those are two different properties you can combine. You can have a public and final named template for instance: user importing your stylesheet can use it, but not redefine it. Both concepts are related as they refine the possible use of a component, but in different ways. Of course, because private things cannot be accessed at all, then cannot be redefined neither... Regards, -- Florent Georges http://www.fgeorges.org/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Qualified variable names, Andrew Welch | Thread | Re: [xsl] Qualified variable names, Andrew Welch |
Re: [xsl] unparsed-text-collection(, Colin Paul Adams | Date | RE: [xsl] 2.1: Inbuilt equivalent o, Michael Kay |
Month |