[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
--On Tuesday, November 04, 2008 15:14:49 +0000 Colin Paul Adams wrote:
As far as I have been able to discover, RFC1738 is still the one that contains the current definition of the file URL scheme.
The syntax explicitly allows both "?" and "=" in 'fsegment' from which 'fpath' is formed. The file scheme does not have a query string because what looks like a query string according to the generic URI syntax is actually part of the file path.
There is scope for some chaos there ... (how many relative URI resolvers have the correct special case for file scheme?)
Re: [xsl] typing the input from within xslt
Subject: Re: [xsl] typing the input from within xslt From: Owen Rees <owen.rees@xxxxxx> Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:08:02 +0000 |
--On Tuesday, November 04, 2008 15:14:49 +0000 Colin Paul Adams wrote:
I agree with both those statements.
It is still non-conformant, and I don't think you should do this.
As far as I have been able to discover, RFC1738 is still the one that contains the current definition of the file URL scheme.
The syntax explicitly allows both "?" and "=" in 'fsegment' from which 'fpath' is formed. The file scheme does not have a query string because what looks like a query string according to the generic URI syntax is actually part of the file path.
There is scope for some chaos there ... (how many relative URI resolvers have the correct special case for file scheme?)
-- Owen Rees; speaking personally, and not on behalf of HP. ======================================================== Hewlett-Packard Limited. Registered No: 690597 England Registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] typing the input from wit, Colin Paul Adams | Thread | Re: [xsl] typing the input from wit, Colin Paul Adams |
RE: [xsl] determine the number of p, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] typing the input from wit, Colin Paul Adams |
Month |