[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: [xsl] checking sequence inside processing-instruction

Subject: Re: [xsl] checking sequence inside processing-instruction
From: "Ganesh Babu N" <nbabuganesh@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 10:27:37 +0530

Thanks mike for your valuable solution. I am using XSLT 1.0.

Regards,
Ganesh


On 7/3/08, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > <xsl:template match="processing-instruction('page')">
>>
>>   I first thought that was a mistake.  I always used the form
>> processing-instruction(page) instead (well, the rare times I
>> used it).
>> But I checked in the REC and saw that both forms are allowed.
>>  Is there any particular reason behind that choice?
>
> XPath 1.0 required the quotes. XPath 2.0 allowed the unquoted name for
> consistency with the new syntax element(e) and attribute(a); it was felt
> that the quotes were a bad idea because they suggested to users that an
> arbitrary expression could be used here, rather than a constant name. I used
> the quotes because I didn't know whether the OP was using 1.0 or 2.0.
>
> Michael Kay
> http://www.saxonica.com/

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] checking sequence inside processing-instruction Ganesh Babu N - 3 Jul 2008 04:50:16 -0000 Michael Kay - 3 Jul 2008 09:15:37 -0000 Florent Georges - 3 Jul 2008 09:51:28 -0000 Michael Kay - 3 Jul 2008 10:32:38 -0000 Ganesh Babu N - 4 Jul 2008 04:58:13 -0000 <=

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [xsl] checking sequence inside , Michael Kay	Thread	[xsl] Validation XSLT using XSLT 1., Ganesh Babu N
Re: [xsl] Validation XSLT using XSL, Ganesh Babu N	Date	[xsl] Windows-style CRLF in text ou, Steven Hentschel
	Month

© 2002-2008 SyncRO Soft Ltd. All rights reserved.
                                             | Sitemap | Privacy Policy 
 This website was created & generated with
                                             <oXygen/> XML Editor


	Keywords xpath xslt