[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

[xsl] XProc or not XProc?

Subject: [xsl] XProc or not XProc?
From: "Vladimir Nesterovsky" <vladimir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 19:38:18 +0300

Hello!

In the project I'm working on, I've found myself performing tasks XProc was designed for. Namely perfroming a series of transformations, according to a configuration, with massive input, and output, and with error handling.

To achieve a desired effect I had to create a set of extension function.

And now, I have questions:

Is XProc so really required?

Why should XProc be designed rather than extending (providing new api for) xslt/xquery to perform pipeline processing?

Are xslt/xquery less declarative than XProc?

I wouldn't probably asked such questions if XProc were already well established with implementations available.

-- Vladimir Nesterovsky

Current Thread
[xsl] XProc or not XProc? Vladimir Nesterovsky - 28 Jun 2008 16:38:38 -0000 <= bryan rasmussen - 28 Jun 2008 16:45:07 -0000 Michael Kay - 29 Jun 2008 10:22:02 -0000 <Possible follow-ups> vladimir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx - 29 Jun 2008 11:42:28 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] test context node existen, Colin Paul Adams	Thread	Re: [xsl] XProc or not XProc?, bryan rasmussen
Re: [xsl] OOXML, Colin Paul Adams	Date	Re: [xsl] XProc or not XProc?, bryan rasmussen
	Month

© 2002-2008 SyncRO Soft Ltd. All rights reserved.
                                             | Sitemap | Privacy Policy 
 This website was created & generated with
                                             <oXygen/> XML Editor