[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT

Subject: Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT
From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 20:02:17 +0100

>>>>> "Scott" == Scott Trenda <Scott.Trenda@xxxxxxxx> writes:

    Scott> Pointing to non-standard extension functions and possibly
    Scott> insecure (or locked) protocols to do what, admittedly, seem
    Scott> like hacks in XSLT isn't a real substitute for a
    Scott> well-designed (perhaps even standardized) XML language
    Scott> designed specifically to deal with the day-to-day
    Scott> requirements of an average webserver.

There are no languages designed to do these things - only languages
with library routines.

So you are right that it's not a substitute - it's the same thing.
-- 
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, Scott Trenda	Thread	RE: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, Scott Trenda
RE: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, Scott Trenda	Date	Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, James A. Robinson
	Month

© 2002-2008 SyncRO Soft Ltd. All rights reserved.
                                             | Sitemap | Privacy Policy 
 This website was created & generated with
                                             <oXygen/> XML Editor


	Keywords xml xslt