[XSL-LIST Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date]

Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT

Subject: Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT
From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:25:26 +0100

>>>>> "Scott" == Scott Trenda <Scott.Trenda@xxxxxxxx> writes:

    Scott> I mean a language, to be used on the server side on web
    Scott> servers, that can talk to the database, the file system,
    Scott> and other protocols, and dynamically assemble an HTML or
    Scott> XML view of a requested page to be delivered to the
    Scott> client. 

XSLT?

    Scott> Also, I don't claim to know why you think preprocessors are
    Scott> "just bad", but just because many of the current
    Scott> implementations are ugly doesn't make the idea flawed.

Ready any text book on the subject.
-- 
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, (continued) Colin Paul Adams - 27 Jun 2008 15:10:55 -0000 Scott Trenda - 27 Jun 2008 15:13:08 -0000 Colin Paul Adams - 27 Jun 2008 15:16:49 -0000 Scott Trenda - 27 Jun 2008 15:23:43 -0000 Colin Paul Adams - 27 Jun 2008 15:25:51 -0000 <= Andrew Welch - 27 Jun 2008 15:39:49 -0000 Joe Fawcett - 27 Jun 2008 15:44:04 -0000 Andrew Welch - 27 Jun 2008 15:53:27 -0000 Scott Trenda - 27 Jun 2008 18:51:52 -0000

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, Scott Trenda	Thread	Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, Andrew Welch
RE: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, Scott Trenda	Date	RE: [xsl] Split with delimiter and , Pankaj Chaturvedi
	Month

Keywords

xml

Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT

Products

Features

Shop

Resources

Support

Company